ABSTRACT
The recent Covid-19 pandemic has created many challenges and barriers in healthcare, which includes the treatment and management of patients with type 2 diabetes (Robson & Hosseinzadeh, 2021). The purpose of this Evidence-Based Project (EBP) project is to evaluate the effectiveness of type 2 diabetes management through telehealth and answers the following PICOT question: In patients with diabetes type 2 who have difficulties with medical visit compliance (P), will the telehealth platform (I), compared to patient's previous visit HbA1c (C) improve the Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) diagnostic marker (O) over a 12-week period(T)? An extensive literature search of five databases was performed, citation chasing, and a hand search yielded fourteen pieces of evidence ranging from level I to VI (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2019). The pieces of evidence selected for this project support the evidence that telehealth implementation is as effective as the "usual care" or in-person visits to treat type 2 diabetes. The John Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice (JHNEBP) model was selected. Patients with a HbA1c of greater than 6.7% have been asked to schedule two six-week telehealth visits. During the live video visit, a review of medications, and diabetes self-management education (DSME) will be conducted. Participants will be provided with education to promote lifestyle modifications. The visits will be conducted through an Electronic Medical Record (EMR) system that is Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) compliant. A paired t-Test will be used with the data collected from the pre-and post-HbA1c. Improve the management of type 2 diabetes with the incorporation of telemedicine in primary care. Research supports the need to further expand the use of telehealth in primary care, to improve patient outcomes and decrease co-morbidities related to type 2 diabetes.
ABSTRACT
Coronavirus disease has many systemic disease symptoms and has severe consequences for the cardiovascular system. Objective. To assess the role of clinical and laboratory indicators in determining the risk of chronic heart failure (CHF) in COV-ID-19 survivors. Material and methods. In total, 151 patients treated in a monoinfectious hospital from 03.11.20 to 10.02.21 with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 were retrospectively selected. Medical history and laboratory data were collected by reviewing electronic medical records. The data included age, gender, body mass index, smoking status, and comorbidities. The laboratory data included the results of hematology and blood chemistry, coagulation, and the levels of acute-phase proteins. The CHF occurrence was used as the study endpoint. Results and discussion. The study patients were divided into two groups depending on the presence of CHF: group 1 included 46 patients with CHF, and group 2 included 105 patients without CHF. The median age was 66.2 (50-92) years;91 (60.3%) were females. Laboratory tests, such as levels of the hs-C-reactive protein, lactate dehydrogenase, procalcitonin, creatinine, and bilirubin, were statistically significantly different in patients of the study groups, and the median values were higher in patients with CHF. Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) showed statistically significant differences between groups: in patients with CHF, the median was 4.97% compared to 3.62% (p=0.011) in those without CHF. The most significant predictors of an increased risk of CHF were age >=66 years (OR=8.038, p<0.001), procalcitonin level >=0.09 ng/mL (increased the CHF risk by 3.8 times, p<0.001), thrombocy-topenia <=220x109/L (p=0.010), an NLR ratio >=4.11% (p=0.010), and a history of chronic kidney disease (p=0.018). Conclusion. A model has been developed to determine the factors closely associated with the risk of chronic heart failure in CO-VID-19 survivors.Copyright © 2023, Media Sphera Publishing Group. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Face-to-face communication during on-site monitoring is important for clinical trial quality assurance. However, with the coronavirus disease early 2020 pandemic, medical institutions placed restrictions on hospital visits to secure their medical systems. Asahikawa Medical University Hospital similarly established restrictions on outpatient and inpatient visits and legal restrictions on outside vendors. Therefore, the frequency of on-site monitoring of clinical trials conducted at our hospital was reduced. Since there was no sign of convergence at the infection units even after 2 years, we investigated the frequency of on-site monitoring and the frequency of clinical trial deviations in the review of the system. In addition, although a clinical trial deviation report form (previous form)was prepared in the fiscal year 2019, there were many free descriptions, and many deviation reports were difficult to understand. Similarly, there were cases where deviations were not recorded on the deviation report form but only on article records (source documents), such as electronic medical records after consultation with the sponsor, and deviations were not recorded in a uniform format. Thus, the hospital experienced difficulty tabulating and classifying the number of deviation occurrences. Based on this experience, this report describes the progress of revising the clinical trial deviation report, clarifying the items to be included in the report, and establishing a system to clarify the process related to clinical trial deviation occurrences.Copyright: © 2023 the Japanese Society of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics (JSCPT).
ABSTRACT
Objectives: To assess protein and energy intake and duration of venous-venous ECMO in critically ill patients with covid-19 Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational analysis on the intensive care units of a large tertiary private teaching Hospital. Adult patients admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) with laboratory confirmed SARS-CoV-2 (RT-PCR), cannulated on venous-venous ECMO and on exclusive enteral feeding were included. Data between march 2020 and june 2021 were collected. Weight and height data were acquired at the time of admission in ICU. Body mass index (BMI) was subsequently calculated. We obtained delivery and adequacy of nutrition data from a enteral nutrition form routinely filled out by nutritionists during hospitalization. Other data were obtained from electronic medical record. For statistical analysis of the data, we used SPSS version 13.0. Result(s): This cohort included 39 patients. 27 (69.2%) were men, mean age was 50 (+/- 12) years and 11 (28,2%) had more than 60 years. The more prevalent comorbidities were obesity in 22 (56%), hypertension in 20 (51,3%) and diabetes in 6 (15,4%) patients. The mean time on ECMO was 24.7 +/- 15.2 days. 29 patients (74%) died. Regarding nutritional support, the average protein intake was 0,9 +/- 0.4 g/kg/day and calories 13.9 +/- 5.2 cal/kg/day. No statistically significant association was observed between the nutritional intake and the duration on ECMO and clinical outcomes of patients. Conclusion(s): There was a high mortality in our cohort. Center;s inexperience may have played a role in these results, in addition to other factors. We observed a high prevalence of obesity. Neither energy nor protein intake were associated with the duration of ECMO and clinical outcomes. These results are similar to other recent observational studies where an insufficient energy and protein intake did not affected mortality or other outcomes. Our small sample and study design prevents a definitive conclusion on the subject. Thus, we propose further studies to elucidate the role of adequate nutrional strategies to improve outcomes and reabilitation of patients on ECMO.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: To compare pregnancy loss rates, preterm birth rates and gestational age at delivery in women vaccinated against COVID-19 during pregnancy vs. those unvaccinated. Method(s): Data were captured from Dorsata Prenatal, an electronic medical record (EMR) system that captures obstetrical data for tens of thousands of pregnancies annually. Patients who delivered between February 11, 2021-June 2, 2022, were included. The vaccinated group included women who had at least one COVID-19 vaccination documented in their EMR between 30 days prior to pregnancy and delivery. The unvaccinated group included women without a COVID-19 vaccination documented. The primary outcome measure was gestational age (GA) at delivery. We analyzed the data using chi-square tests, with significance set at p<0.01. Result(s): A total of 51,994 pregnant women were identified-7,947 (15.3%) in the vaccinated group and 44,047 (84.7%) in the unvaccinated group. Vaccination rate varied by race (Asian: 19.7%;White: 17.3%;Black: 11.2%, P<0.001), ethnicity (Latino: 8.6%;Not-Latino: 18.7%;P<0.001), marital status (Married: 19.2%;Single: 8.8%;P<0.001), mother's age (>=35 years: 20.0%;<35 years 14.2%;P<0.001), and region (Northeast: 19.2%;South: 15.2%;West: 9.1%;P<0.001). The vaccinated group had significantly lower rate of preterm delivery (Gestational Age [GA]<37 weeks;vaccinated: 7.8% vs. unvaccinated: 9.6%;P<0.001), and significantly lower rates of pregnancy loss (GA<20 weeks;vaccinated: 1.1% vs. unvaccinated: 4.1%;P<0.001). Conclusion(s): This is one of the largest real-world studies to date in women who received the COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy. Vaccination rates varied significantly across race/ethnicity. Vaccinated patients had lower preterm delivery and pregnancy loss rates compared with unvaccinated patients.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Introduction: COVID-19 vaccination substantially reduces morbidity and mortality associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and severe illness. However, despite effective COVID-19 vaccines many questions remain about the efficacy of vaccines and the durability and robustness of immune responses, especially in immunocompromised persons. The NCI-funded Serological Sciences Network (SeroNet) is a coordinated effort including 11 sites to advance research on the immune response to SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 vaccination among diverse and vulnerable populations. The goals of the Pooling Project are: (1) to conduct real-world data (RWD) analyses using electronic medical records (EMR) data from four health care systems (Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Northwell Health, Veterans Affairs-Case Western, and Cedars-Sinai) to determine vaccine effectiveness in (a) cancer patients;(b) autoimmune diseases and (c) solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR);(2) to conduct meta-analyses of prospective cohort studies from eight SeroNet institutions (Cedars-Sinai, Johns Hopkins, Northwell Health, Emory University, University of Minnesota, Mount Sinai, Yale University) to determine post-vaccine immune responses in (a) lung cancer patients;(b) hematologic cancers/hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients;(c) SOTR;(d) lupus. Method(s): For our RWD analyses, data is extracted from EMR using standardized algorithms using ICD-10 codes to identify immunocompromised persons (hematologic and solid organ malignancy;SOTR;autoimmune disease, including inflammatory bowel disease, rheumatoid arthritis, and SLE). We use common case definitions to extract data on demographic, laboratory values, clinical co morbidity, COVID-19 vaccination, SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe COVID-19, and diseasespecific variables. In addition, we pool individual-level data from prospective cohorts enrolling patients with cancer and other immunosuppressed conditions from across network. Surveys and biospecimens from serology and immune profiling are collected at pre-specified timepoints across longitudinal cohorts. Result(s): Currently, we have EMR data extracted from 4 health systems including >715,000 cancer patients, >9,500 SOTR and >180,000 with autoimmune conditions. Prospective cohorts across the network have longitudinal data on >450 patients with lung cancer, >1,200 patients with hematologic malignancies, >400 SOTR and >400 patients with lupus. We will report results examining vaccine effectiveness for prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection, severe COVID-19 and post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PAS-C or long COVID) in cancer patients compared to other immunocompromised conditions. Conclusion(s): Our goal is to inform public health guidelines on COVID-19 vaccine and boosters to reduce SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe illness in immunocompromised populations.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: To describe demographic characteristics, comorbidities, and exacerbations in a cohort of patients with COPD in Chile. Method(s): Retrospective cohort study using INTEGRAMEDICA (a network of ambulatory medical centers) electronic medical records of patients with COPD aged >=40 years at index with data available one year before (baseline) and after (follow-up) index. Index date was fixed at 28-Feb-2019 to avoid including data from the COVID-19 pandemic. Moderate and severe exacerbations were defined as prescription of systemic corticosteroid/antibiotics and emergency visit/hospitalization, respectively. Result(s): In total, 19,000 patients were included. In the baseline period, 86% (n=16,400) had no moderate or severe exacerbations (NMSE), 13% (n=2,503) had only moderate exacerbations (OME) and <1% (n=96) had >=1 severe exacerbation (SEV). Mean age/proportion of females was: 64 years/60% (total cohort), 65 years/59% (NMSE), 61 years/67% (OME) and 73 years/62% (SEV). The four most frequent comorbidities were: hypertension (total: 17.6%;NMSE: 16.2%;OME: 26.0%;SEV: 24.0%), asthma (total: 8.9%;NMSE: 7.8%;OME: 15.3%;SEV: 17.7%), diabetes type 1/2 (total: 6.3%;NMSE: 5.9%;OME: 9.1%;SEV: 7.3%) and congestive heart failure (total: 3.2%;NMSE: 3.2%;OME: 2.9%;SEV: 4.2%). The proportion of patients with >=1 moderate/severe exacerbation during follow-up was 14% (total), 10% (NMSE), 38% (OME) and 35% (SEV). The severe exacerbation rate was 2.00 per 1,000 person-years in the overall population and increased based on exacerbation history (NMSE: 0.91;OME: 1.60;SEV: 197.92) Conclusion(s): Preliminary results indicate that severe exacerbations were more frequent in patients with a history of SEV compared with patients with a history of OME or NMSE. In addition, comorbidities were more frequent in patients with a history of exacerbation. To improve patient health outcomes, strategies with a multisectoral approach should be prioritized as COPD can coexist with, and be aggravated by, other chronic comorbidities. Funding(s):GSK [209968].Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Objectives: Due to large sample sizes, electronic medical records (EMR) databases have the potential to provide pivotal insights into patients diagnosed with rare, orphan, or emerging diseases. This study aimed to explore the patient profile of African and American trypanosomiasis, both vector-borne parasitic diseases, pre-and post the COVID-19 pandemic using the TriNetX Network. Method(s): From Jan 1, 2018 - Nov 30, 2019 (pre-COVID) and Jan 1, 2020 - Nov 30, 2021 (post-COVID) patients were queried from the TriNetX Global health research network, inclusive of 88 million patients from the United States (US), Europe, the Middle East, Africa, Latin America, and Asia Pacific. Eligible patients with an ICD-10 diagnosis code of African trypanosomiasis or American trypanosomiasis were identified (2280 patients on 22-Dec-2022) and analyzed separately, pre- and post-COVID. Result(s): We identified 340 patients pre- and 960 patients post-COVID with African trypanosomiasis and 960 patients pre- and 190 patients post-COVID with American trypanosomiasis. Most patients resided in the US. Pre-COVID African trypanosomiasis patients had a mean age of 38 and were 59% female while post-COVID patients had a mean age of 34 and were 57% female. Pre-COVID American trypanosomiasis patients had a mean age of 49 and were 57% female while post-COVID patients had a mean age of 49 and were 53% female. Top co-diagnoses included diseases of the respiratory (85%, 84%) and nervous systems (82%, 79%) for patients with African trypanosomiasis and diseases of the digestive (69%, 54%) and circulatory systems (68%, 61%) for patients with American trypanosomiasis in both the pre- and post-COVID cohorts, respectively. Conclusion(s): Using real-world EMR data we were able to obtain patient profiles for a rare disease (African trypanosomiasis) and a common, emerging disease (American trypanosomiasis). This informationsupportsutilizing EMR data for describing patient populations in rare, orphan, or emerging diseases, which may aid drug development for these indications.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Background: The combination of venetoclax and azacitidine was licensed as a treatment regime for AML during the COVID-19 pandemic and has only been available for a short period of time. It has been widely adopted, including by our centre, for use in older adults and those with multiple co-morbidities, for whom intensive treatment might not be appropriate, but where low-intensity treatment or palliative care is also considered inappropriate. We feel that our patient cohort has been experiencing a lot of cytopaenias with the regime and thus treatment has been de-escalated more commonly than seen in the VIALE-A trial1 and so decided to carry out an audit of our practice. Method(s): Patients were identified by our pharmacy colleagues as having had Blueteq forms completed for venetoclax-azacitidine treatment. We then looked at their electronic medical records to ascertain their age, co-morbidities, treatment received, any treatment modifications made (and reasons for these adjustments), disease course and time until death. Result(s): We identified 22 patients who have received treatment with venetoclax and azacitidine, since October 2020. Eleven of these patients are now deceased (50%), with causes of death attributable to progressive disease or infection. The median age of our patient population was 72 years old (range of 51-84). The maximal number of cycles of venetoclax-azacitidine that have been delivered to a single patient is 12 (with cessation following disease progression). 9/22 patients had no dose modifications made to treatment, but of these, six patients only received one cycle of treatment (prior to progressive disease or death from sepsis). The rest of the patients (13) have had dose reductions to shorter courses of venetoclax (to between 21 days and 7 days) or have been changed to azacitidine alone (5/13 patients). One of our 22 patients has now received an allograft. Conclusion(s): Our patients routinely receive posaconazole prophylaxis, and thus a dose of 100 mg venetoclax (due to the known interaction), rather than the 400 mg dose used in the VIALE-A trial1-it may be that this, (and that it is equivalent to an actual dose of greater than 400 mg), is the reason behind the increased incidence of cytopaenias and increased need to de-escalate treatment. In the future it would be helpful and informative to compare our practice to that of other centres.
ABSTRACT
Aim of the study. To study the experience of using focused transthoracic echocardiography in patients with COVID-19 in prone position (fEchoPr) in intensive care units (ICU). Materials and methods. The retrospective observational study included 53 patients (period from 15 April to 31 December 2020). Inclusion criteria: confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19, availability of fEchoPr data, outcome certainty (discharge/death). We analyzed electronic medical records. The fEchoPr was performed in patients in the prone position with a bolster under the left side of the chest and left arm raised ('swimmer's position'). We assessed the systolic function of the right ventricle (RV) (tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE)), RV size, RV/LV ratio, systolic function of the left ventricle (LV) (left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral. (LVOT VTI)), and pulmonary hypertension (PH) (tricuspid regurgitation peak gradient (PGTR). Depending on the results, the patients were divided into 2 groups: informative (+fEchoPr) and non-informative (-fEchoPr) examinations. Results. There was no statistically significant difference in the groups (+fEcho n = 35 vs -fEcho n = 18) by age (65.6 +/- 15.3 vs 60.2 +/- 15.8, p > 0.05), by gender (male: 23 (65.7%) vs 14 (77.8%), p > 0.05), by body mass index (31.3 +/- 5.3 kg/m2 vs 29.5 +/- 5.4 kg/m2, p > 0.05), by mechanical ventilation support (24 (68.6%) vs 17 (94.4%), p = 0.074), by NEWS scale indicators (6.9 +/- 3.7 vs 8.5 +/- 3.5 points), by mortality (82.8% vs 94.4%, p > 0.05). Correlation analysis revealed a moderate inverse relationship between being on mechanical ventilation and the informative value of the study (Spearman's r = -0.30 at p = 0.033). In the +fEchoPr group, the correct measurement of TAPSE and RV/LV was carried out in 100%: a decrease in RV systolic function was recorded in 5 patients (14%), expansion of the RV in 13 patients (37%). Signs of PH were detected in 11 patients (31%), PGTR could not be measured in 10 patients (28%). LV systolic dysfunction was detected in 7 patients (20%). No pathology was detected in 16 patients (46%). One patient was diagnosed with infective endocarditis of native mitral valve, which was later confirmed by autopsy. Conclusion. In 66% of cases, fEchoPr examinations were informative, especially in terms of assessing the state of the right heart. fEchoPr examination is an affordable, valid and reproducible method to assess and monitor the state of the heart in ICU patients.Copyright © 2021 VIDAR Publishing House. All Rights Reserved.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: Bariatric surgery has evolved over the past two decades yet assessing trends of bariatric surgery utilization in the growing eligible population is lacking.This study aimed to update the trends in bariatric surgery utilization, changes in types of procedures performed, and the characteristics of patients who underwent bariatric surgery in the US, using real-world data. Method(s): This cross-sectional study was conducted using the TriNetX, a federated electronic medical records network from 2012 to 2021, for adult patients 18 years old or older who had bariatric surgery. Descriptive statistical analysis was conducted to assess patients' demographics and characteristics. Annual secular trend analyses were conducted for the annual rate of bariatric surgery, and the specific procedural types and proportions of laparoscopic surgeries. Result(s): A steady increase in the number of procedures performed in the US over the first six years of the study, a plateau for the following two years, and then a decline in 2020 and 2021 (during the coronavirus-19 pandemic). The annual rate of bariatric surgery was lowest in 2012 at 59.2 and highest in 2018 at 79.6 surgeries per 100,000 adults. During the study period, 96.2% to 98.8% of procedures performed annually were conducted laparoscopically as opposed to the open technique. Beginning in 2012, the Roux-en-Y (RYGB) procedure fell to represent only 17.1% of cases in 2018, along with a sharp decline in the adjustable gastric band (AGB) procedure, replaced by a sharp increase in the sleeve gastrectomy (SG) procedure to represent over 74% of cases in 2018. Conclusion(s): Bariatric surgery utilization in the US showed a moderate decline in the number of RYGB procedures, which was offset by a substantial increase in the number of SG procedures and a precipitous drop in the annual number of AGB procedures.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Objectives: To examine patients' telehealth usability during COVID-19 in Dubai. Method(s): A cross-sectional retrospective study adopted Telehealth Usability Questionnaire (TUQ). A total of 64,173 participants who used telehealth services during 2020 - 2021 were recruited from the electronic medical record to participate in electronic survey from October to December 2022. The survey was administered through DHA text messaging system. The survey examined participants' characteristics and the six domains of TUQ with a Likert scale. Frequency, percentage, and weighted mean score percentages were used as descriptive statistics to analyze this data. Result(s): A total of 1,535 participants completed the survey. The overall TUQ showed the mean age of users was 43.37 years (+/-11.67 SD). More than half of the users were females (65.21%), the majority were married (74.46%), of a UAE nationality (83.58%), had higher education (56.68%), and were currently working (57.13%). Consultations and COVID-19-related concerns (45.14%), medication refills (19.80%), and laboratory tests (18.24%) were the main reasons for telehealth visits. Weighted means of TUQ six domains were usefulness (87.11%), ease of use and learnability (86.98%), interface quality (85.73%), interaction quality (86.44%), reliability (79.48%), and satisfaction and future use (86.44%). Conclusion(s): Our study revealed high levels of usability and willingness to use telehealth services as an alternative modality to in-person consultations among the participants of the survey. Our results support the implementation of telehealth services in DHA;however, further studies are required to understand the applicability of telehealth after COVID-19 and how to further improve satisfaction.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Colorectal Cancer (CRC) is on the rise, prompting the need for earlier screening in the United States (U.S.) population. The American Cancer Society now recommends screening for CRC in patients with average risk at the age of 45. Further complicating this picture, the COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted the routine screening process for CRC, which we hypothesize has impacted the stage at which CRC is detected. We sought to determine the extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic has affected colorectal cancer diagnosis trends at a large urban community hospital. Method(s): We performed a retrospective analysis of patients, comparing two time periods: pre-pandemic (1/1/2019-1/31/2020) and during COVID pandemic (2/1/2020-9/29/21). Data was extracted from the electronic medical record (EMR) to compile a database of patients diagnosed with CRC during these time periods. Patients included in this study had a new diagnosis of colorectal cancer and either followed with colorectal specialists at the hospital or had undergone tissue biopsy analysis by the Department of Pathology. The primary outcome was determining the stage at which CRC was detected and the modality utilized for CRC screening in that patient. Additional variables collected were as follows: age, pathological findings (grade, presence of tumor mutations, or microsatellite instability), gender, race, and insurance. Result(s): Data was collected from a total of 380 patients, which included 190 patients diagnosed with CRC within the timeframe defined as pre-pandemic and 190 diagnosed with CRC within the timeframe defined as during the pandemic. CRC diagnosis was analyzed in terms of TNM stage at time of diagnosis (Stages 0 through IV). Stage III and IV were grouped together and categorized as a late-stage diagnosis, whereas Stages 0, I, and II were grouped together and categorized as an early-stage diagnosis. Late-stage diagnosis was found in 34.7% (66/190) of patients in the pre-pandemic group. In comparison, late-stage diagnosis was found in 46.3% (88/190) of patients in the during pandemic group. Conclusion(s): Our results suggest that the COVID-19 pandemic did produce delays in care and work-up for CRC. We believe this is why CRC stage at the time of initial diagnosis was later for patients diagnosed during the pandemic than for patients diagnosed prior to the pandemic. In the future, we hope to evaluate if the impact of COVID-19 is reflected in tumor grade and genetic mutations at the time of diagnosis, and determine race and gender disparities.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Stem cell transplantation (SCT) in patients with hematological cancers results in longstanding physical changes. Commonly reported symptoms include chronic fatigue, global weakness, interference with activities of daily living (ADLs) and aerobic deconditioning. Aside from the sequela of symptoms experienced post SCT, these patients remain in an immunosuppressed state for several months following discharge from the hospital. Patients are often advised by their medical team to isolate themselves unless to attend follow-up outpatient clinic appointments. With the COVID-19 pandemic, this functional gap in the continuum of care worsened. As a result, SCT patients are both hesitant and discouraged to pursue outpatient or home health physical therapy even when these services are warranted. Thus, there is great need for options to safely optimize function for people post-SCT that are suitable in today's ever-changing environment. The purpose of this case series is to describe the functional impact of incorporating telehealth into the continuum of care for post SCT patients. CASE DESCRIPTION: 9 patients post inpatient admission for SCT were triaged to telehealth PT based on their scores on the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) and the Activity Measure for Post Acute Care (AM-PAC) at the time of discharge from inpatient care. Scores on the SPPB ranged from 5-11, and AMPAC scores ranged from 21-24, demonstrating physical impairment. Patients were scheduled to receive telehealth twice a week. Sessions consisted of therapeutic exercises monitored via secure video software. Lab values were monitored via electronic medical record to assess appropriateness for therapy prior to each session. Rating of perceived exertion (RPE) scale and patientowned pulse oximeter were used to monitor patient fatigue levels. Patients' progress was assessed via Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS), Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) and 5-times sit to stand (5xSTS) scores. OUTCOME(S): One year post telehealth implementation, patients reported improved independence and achievement of selfselected goals. Notable patient quotes include, "I feel less fearful in climbing up and down the stairs, and I feel more independent with laundry and cooking.which was very important for me." Additionally, patients reported a decrease in LEFS and BFI scores. Initial LEFS scores averaged 40% and dropped to 20% by discharge. Similarly, BFI scores dropped by 2 points at discharge, reflecting improved self-reported functional performance and a return to pre transplant fatigue levels. 5xSTS scores decreased by greater than 3 seconds in 6 of 9 patients, with one patient performing where previously unable. DISCUSSION: Telehealth services provide an additional method of care delivery to those unable to seek it in the traditional sense. For the severely immunocompromised, physical therapy via telehealth provides direct connection to providers trained in oncology rehabilitation serving as a feasible bridge between inpatient and outpatient care for amelioration of side effects associated with SCT.
ABSTRACT
Background: Total parenteral nutrition (TPN) is a life-saving therapy for patients with chronic intestinal failure. TPN typically consists of macronutrients (amino acids, dextrose, and lipids) as well as micronutrients (multi-vitamins [MVI] and trace elements) to meet fluid, calorie, and micronutrient needs. With the early years of PN administration, multiple deficiencies were noted leading to guidelines regarding need for daily use of essential trace element and MVI preparation for parenteral use. Unfortunately, during the last few years we have seen multiple shortages of PN related supplies including the most recent shortage of parenteral MVI preparation. Major organizations such as ASPEN have developed recommendations regarding management of shortages, however their clinical impact has not been fully evaluated. The current study evaluated the impact of MVI shortage on change in clinical practice and the prevalence of deficiency. Method(s): A retrospective review of electronic medical records for patients who received TPN during time of shortage in IV multivitamins supply due to COVID-19 crisis between January 2021 and June 2021. In our program, the shortage affected one TPN supplier. We included patients who received their TPN from affected supplier and who were tested for micronutrients including Vitamins A, B12, C, and D in the 6 months preceding the shortage in supply (period 1) as well as during the shortage period (period 2). Period 1 was defined as from July 1, 2020, to December 31, 2020, and period 2 was defined as from January 1, 2021, to June 30, 2021. In addition to baseline clinical characteristics, we captured changes in studied micronutrients. Result(s): Current retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database noted 21 patients (mean age of 63.3 +/- 13.8, 62% female) were impacted by MVI shortage during study period (Table 1). Most common primary diagnosis was Crohn's disease (33.3%) followed by enterocutaneous fistula (19%), and gastrointestinal dysmotility (14.3%). In 19/21 (90%) patients, MVI was administered 3 days per week in PN. In the remaining two patients who had short bowel,MVI was continued 7 days per week. Additionally, 19/21 (90%) patients also were supplemented orally with Vitamin D (17/21), Vitamin B12 (5/21), MVI (3/21), Vitamin C (1/21). There was a decline in average Vitamin C levels between the two study periods (Table 2) with a trend towards a decline in average 25-hydroxy vitamin D levels, while mean vitamin A and B12 levels did not change significantly. There was a significant increase in Vitamin D and C deficiencies, while no increase in deficiencies in Vitamin E, A, and B12 levels was noted (Figure 1). Conclusion(s): Unfortunately, shortages of key PN related supplies have become commonplace in the last few years. The most recent shortage affected MVI supplies. Our group managed the shortage through a combination of reduction of parenteral MVI administration to 3 days per week along with additional supplementation of specific micronutrients orally. Although with this strategy, there was an increase in Vitamin D and C levels falling below reference range, no significant deficiencies were noted. (Table Presented).
ABSTRACT
The ability of a health information exchange (HIE) to consolidate information, collected from multiple, disparate information systems, into a single, person-centric health record can provide a comprehensive and longitudinal representation of an individual's medical history. Shared, longitudinal health records can be leveraged to enhance the delivery of individual clinical care and provide opportunities to improve health outcomes at the population level. This chapter describes the clinical benefits imparted by the shared health record (SHR) component an HIE infrastructure. It also characterizes the potential public health benefits of the aggregate level, population health indicators calculated, stored, and distributed by a health management information system (HMIS) component. Tools for visualizing health indicators from the HMIS, including disease surveillance systems developed during the COVID-19 pandemic, are also described. Postpandemic components such as the SHR and HMIS will likely play critical roles in strengthening health information infrastructures in states and nations. © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Background: Patients with COVID-19 experience prolonged ICU stays. The rate of malnutrition in hospitalized patients remains controversial as well as the appropriate nutrition therapy for these patients. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the impact of nutrition support on clinical outcomes in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Method(s): This was a retrospective chart review involving 48 adults, critically ill patients admitted with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Data extracted included demographic, anthropometric, medical history, biochemical tests, medications, nutrition support protocol, clinical outcomes, length of stay, and ventilator status. We tested associations between aspects of nutrition support (such as early versus delayed feeding, adequacy, and patient positioning) and clinical outcomes (ICU length of stay, weight status, malnutrition status, refeeding syndrome, and ventilator days) using Chi-square, and t-tests, with significance established at the level of p <= 0.05. Result(s): Thirty-eight percent (18) of the patients met the criteria for malnutrition using the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) tool. Approximately 83% of these patients did not have a documented diagnosis of malnutrition in the electronic medical record. More than half of the patients in the study (58.3%) were placed in prone position as part of their treatment and only 7% of these had documented signs of feeding intolerance. None of the patients were switched to total parenteral nutrition (TPN). Only 37% of the patients received adequate protein within the first week of nutrition support while 98% had adequate or exceeded caloric needs. There was no difference in percent weight loss among patients who received inadequate protein compared to those who had adequate protein. Inadequate protein intake was associated with shorter ICU stays (p = 0.04) and fewer ventilator days (p = 0.01) compared to those with adequate protein. Patients who received inadequate or exceeded their calories needs also had shorter ICU stays and fewer ventilator days (p > 0.05). In the context of this study, shorter ICU stays translated into fewer days of life, as 98% of the studied population died before ICU discharge. There were no associations between early nutrition support and selected biochemical parameters. Conclusion(s): The rate of malnutrition was remarkable and largely undocumented. Most patients did not meet the minimum estimated protein needs. Studies with larger sample sizes are needed to examine appropriate protein needs and the effect of nutrition support in patients with COVID-19. Diagnosing and documenting malnutrition warrants heightened attention.
ABSTRACT
Background: With NHS PrEP now available for those at risk, we aimed to identify missed opportunities for people newly diagnosed with HIV who attended sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services, and to determine the HIV outcomes associated with people acquiring HIV with previous or recent PrEP use. Method(s): A retrospective observational study reviewed all new HIV diagnoses from the last 2 years to see if they were eligible for PrEP and offered in SRH services. Data was collected using electronic medical records on HIV outcomes - virological suppression, resistance and antiretroviral choice. Result(s): There were 74 new HIV diagnoses. 41 people were eligible but only 10 were known to have accessed PrEP at our services. 21% were heterosexual and of black ethnicity - it was not possible to ascertain whether they were eligible for PrEP from the notes. Of the 10 people with recent PrEP use, 2 stopped due to side effects;headaches, vomiting, fatigue and renal toxicity concerns. For the remaining adherence concerns were reported - taking event based dosing (EBD) incorrectly and difficulty accessing services. 80% of people achieved virological suppression. 90% were put on a second generation integrase or protease inhibitor. No one developed nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) resistance. 6 people eligible for PrEP had attended SRH services but not given PrEP. 2 attended during the IMPACT trial being full and referred to IwantPrEPnow. 2 attended during COVID where baseline bloods were done with follow up but subsequently tested positive. 2 people refused PrEP with 1 deeming themselves to be low risk. Conclusion(s): Our data highlights several missed opportunities for starting same-day PrEP which potentially may have prevented HIV acquisition. If PrEP is not issued on the day, adequate follow up must be ensured. Reassuringly those who acquired HIV with recent PrEP use have achieved good virological control without NRTI mutations. Counselling on potential side effects, EBD dosing and ongoing HIV risk are essential. Despite NHS PrEP available over 2 years, our data shows we are still failing to meet the demand of PrEP not only in men who have sex with men but also in other key at risk groups.
ABSTRACT
Coronavirus disease has many systemic disease symptoms and has severe consequences for the cardiovascular system. Objective. To assess the role of clinical and laboratory indicators in determining the risk of chronic heart failure (CHF) in COV-ID-19 survivors. Material and methods. In total, 151 patients treated in a monoinfectious hospital from 03.11.20 to 10.02.21 with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 were retrospectively selected. Medical history and laboratory data were collected by reviewing electronic medical records. The data included age, gender, body mass index, smoking status, and comorbidities. The laboratory data included the results of hematology and blood chemistry, coagulation, and the levels of acute-phase proteins. The CHF occurrence was used as the study endpoint. Results and discussion. The study patients were divided into two groups depending on the presence of CHF: group 1 included 46 patients with CHF, and group 2 included 105 patients without CHF. The median age was 66.2 (50-92) years;91 (60.3%) were females. Laboratory tests, such as levels of the hs-C-reactive protein, lactate dehydrogenase, procalcitonin, creatinine, and bilirubin, were statistically significantly different in patients of the study groups, and the median values were higher in patients with CHF. Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) showed statistically significant differences between groups: in patients with CHF, the median was 4.97% compared to 3.62% (p=0.011) in those without CHF. The most significant predictors of an increased risk of CHF were age >=66 years (OR=8.038, p<0.001), procalcitonin level >=0.09 ng/mL (increased the CHF risk by 3.8 times, p<0.001), thrombocy-topenia <=220x109/L (p=0.010), an NLR ratio >=4.11% (p=0.010), and a history of chronic kidney disease (p=0.018). Conclusion. A model has been developed to determine the factors closely associated with the risk of chronic heart failure in CO-VID-19 survivors.Copyright © 2023, Media Sphera Publishing Group. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Dietary therapy for eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an effective first-line treatment aimed at identifying triggers by systematically removing then reintroducing food groups. Success on diet therapy can be augmented by working with a dietitian, but this is not a universal clinical resource. Virtual or telehealth approaches to nutrition care may offer opportunities to implement diet therapy for EoE. We conducted a retrospective study at a tertiary center with six GI dietitians to compare real-world standard in-person versus virtual EoE nutrition practices in terms of access, follow-up< and disease control. Method(s): We identified adults with EoE referred to GI nutrition through query of the electronic medical record by ICD-10 diagnoses and confirmed by chart review. As all nutrition visits prior to the COVID pandemic were performed in-person, standard care was defined as care established in January-December 2019 and virtual care in January-December 2021. Associations were analyzed using Chi-squared and Student's t test (Table). Result(s): A total of 204 patients were included;99 referred for standard in-person and 105 virtual nutrition care. The cohorts did not differ significantly by gender, age at the time of referral, race, and distance lived to our center. Of these, 55.6% (55) standard and 48.6% (51) virtual visits were completed with a dietitian (p=0.341) and 4-food elimination diet was the most commonly planned diet. The majority initiated the diet (80.0% standard, 78.4% virtual, p=0.842) and among them, half successfully attained histologic remission with the elimination phase (63.6% standard, 47.5% virtual, p=0.324). Ultimate treatments plans included remaining on dietary therapy (25.5% standard, 23.5% virtual, p=0.728), no treatment or lost to follow-up (34.6% standard, 25.5% virtual), and medication (25.5% standard, 41.2% virtual). Conclusion(s): There is a growing demand for nutrition care in EoE and in our tertiary practice, we found no differences in the success and response rate on elimination diet or follow-up between patients receiving standard or virtual nutrition care. Virtual approaches to implementing EoE dietary therapy may serve to complement in-person care and offer opportunities for those lacking local dietitian access. However, up to one-third of patients are lost to follow-up or remain untreated, also highlighting a need to identify, understand, and overcome barriers to treatment uptake and disease control .